There Ought to be a Law

THERE OUGHT TO BE A LAW, BUT GO AHEAD! THE JUDGE SAID IT WAS OK!

Go Ahead the Judge said it was OK
Go Ahead the Judge said it was OK

Mass. Court: Subway ‘Upskirt’ Photos Not Illegal

BOSTON March 6, 2014 (AP)
By MARK PRATT Associated Press

Associated Press

A man who took cellphone photos up the skirts of women riding the Boston subway did not violate state law because the women were not nude or partially nude, Massachusetts’ highest court ruled Wednesday.

The Supreme Judicial Court overruled a lower court that had upheld charges against Michael Robertson, who was arrested in August 2010 by transit police who set up a sting after getting reports that he was using his cellphone to take photos and video up female riders’ skirts and dresses.

The ruling immediately prompted top Beacon Hill lawmakers to pledge to update state law.

Existing so-called Peeping Tom laws protect people from being photographed in dressing rooms and bathrooms when nude or partially nude, but the way the law is written, it does not protect clothed people in public areas, the court said.

“A female passenger on a MBTA trolley who is wearing a skirt, dress, or the like covering these parts of her body is not a person who is ‘partially nude,’┬áno matter what is or is not underneath the skirt by way of underwear or other clothing,” the court said in its ruling.

State law “does not apply to photographing (or videotaping or electronically surveilling) persons who are fully clothed and, in particular, does not reach the type of upskirting that the defendant is charged with attempting to accomplish on the MBTA,” the court said.

The SJC said that while such actions should be illegal, they are not, given the way state law is written.

Seems as if the jerk should have been found guilty of some sort of crime like maybe stalking, or some form of rape or sexual harassment. Maybe the Judge is an upskirter too!

A State of Mind